n***@sourceforge.net
2002-05-03 21:59:04 UTC
Bugs item #225731, was opened at 2000-12-13 20:22
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101814&aid=225731&group_id=1814
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Problem with the simple dynamic loader
Initial Comment:
The simple dynamic loader will happily unload a module that has living instances, which will lead to a crash later on. It's design should change a bit to prevent this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=5633
The simple dynamic loader could disappear altogether.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Pierre Phaneuf (pphaneuf)
Date: 2000-12-14 10:47
Message:
There is a number of problems with the current implementation: the interface doesn't support versioning (optional), the module doesn't get a reference to the service manager (ouch!), the dynamic loader probably shouldn't be a factory itself (instead the module should give a factory, but I'm not sure yet about this).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101814&aid=225731&group_id=1814
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101814&aid=225731&group_id=1814
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Problem with the simple dynamic loader
Initial Comment:
The simple dynamic loader will happily unload a module that has living instances, which will lead to a crash later on. It's design should change a bit to prevent this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Pierre Phaneuf (pphaneuf)
Date: 2002-05-03 17:23Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=5633
The simple dynamic loader could disappear altogether.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Pierre Phaneuf (pphaneuf)
Date: 2000-12-14 10:47
Message:
There is a number of problems with the current implementation: the interface doesn't support versioning (optional), the module doesn't get a reference to the service manager (ouch!), the dynamic loader probably shouldn't be a factory itself (instead the module should give a factory, but I'm not sure yet about this).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101814&aid=225731&group_id=1814